Hunger for Health | 孩要健康，救是现在

30- HOUR FAMINE 2011

饥饿三十 2011

http://www.worldvision.com.my/famine/

birthday wish list | 生日清单

1) 黄子华栋笃笑系列

Wong Zhi Wah Stand-up Comedy Series

     

2) 你参与助养儿童计划    

You join Child Sponsorship Programme

http://www.worldvision.com.my/

3) Kitchen Aid Mixer

4) Tiffany & Co.

   

          

5) Jamie Oliver 意大利食谱   

6) 上班衬衫，裤，裙
work attires

7) 70% 可可巧克力
70% cocoa content dark chocolate

8) 手指饼
ladyfingers

9) 水果篮 / 疏菜篮
fruits / vege

10) SCS

                         

11) Kahlua

will you? any one of them will do.
你愿意吗？随便一样都可以

mouse ring | 老鼠环

finally claimed it

终于赎了

ha ha ha ha ha

哈哈哈哈哈

Decision

Come across this from friend's blog, thought of the day,

A group of children were playing near two railway tracks, one still in use while the other disused. Only one child played on the disused track, the rest on the operational track. The train is coming, and you are just beside the track interchange. You can make the train change its course to the disused track and save most of the kids. However, that would also mean the lone child playing by the disused track would be sacrificed. Or would you rather let the train go its way?

Most people might choose to divert the course of the train, and sacrifice only one child. You might think the same way, I guess. Exactly, to save most of the children at the expense of only one child was rational decision most people would make, morally and emotionally. But, have you ever thought that the child choosing to play on the disused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place?

Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was. This kind of dilemma happens around us everyday. In the office, community, in politics and especially in a democratic society, the minority is often sacrificed for the interest of the majority, no matter how foolish or ignorant the majority are, and how farsighted and knowledgeable the minority are. The child who chose not to play with the rest on the operational track was sidelined. And in the case he was sacrificed, no one would shed a tear for him.

The great critic Leo Velski Julian who told the story said he would not try to change the course of the train because he believed that the kids playing on the operational track should have known very well that track was still in use, and that they should have run away if they heard the train's sirens.. If the train was diverted, that lone child would definitely die because he never thought the train could come over to that track! Moreover, that track was not in use probably because it was not safe. If the train was diverted to the track, we could put the lives of all passengers on board at stake! And in your attempt to save a few kids by sacrificing one child, you might end up sacrificing hundreds of people to save these few kids.

While we are all aware that life is full of tough decisions that need to be made, we may not realize that hasty decisions may not always be the right one.

Remember that what's right isn't always popular... and what's popular isn't always right.


P/S Popular is made by people, you are people so you can make popular.

Souvenir from Korea | 韩国纪念品

Someone back from Korea，souvenir for me......

有人从韩国回来，送我。。。

......nice wrapping

。。。美丽的包装

P/S Someone who always say me fat but bring snack to me |一个常嫌我肥的人却送我吃的

think again 。想一想

[source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j7c4HNX3TU]

Think again after you watch the clip.

不喜欢见人，不爱出门，常在屋里。如今站在台上，在观众们前唱歌。想一想。。。。。。

Bigger thighs are better for health

[source: Bigger thighs are better for health, 4th Sept. 2009. http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090904/tuk-bigger-thighs-are-better-for-health-6323e80.html]

Men and women with large thighs have a lower risk of premature death and heart disease, a study has shown.Skip related content

RELATED PHOTOS / VIDEOS

Bigger thighs are better for health

People whose thighs measure at least 23.6in (60cm) in circumference were less likely to develop heart disease or die early, a 12-year study of almost 3,000 men and women in Denmark found.

Professor Berit Heitmann said thigh size could be used by GPs as "an early marker to identify patients at later risk of cardiovascular diseaseand early mortality".

"A small thigh circumference was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases and total mortality in both men and women," he said.

"A threshold effect for thigh circumference was evident, with greatly increased risk of premature death below around 60cm."

He added: "The fact that more than half of the men and women aged 35-65 have thigh circumference below the threshold is worrying."

The Monica (monitoring trends in and determinants of cardiovascular disease) project, published online on bmj.com, found there was no added protective effect for people with thighs in excess of 60cm.

Body fat and other high risk factors such as smoking and high cholesterol were taken into account by the study.

Prof Heitmann, director of the research unit for dietary studies at Copenhagen University Hospital, said: "The adverse effects of small thighs might be related to too little muscle mass in the region."

1st time with paint

during lunch time, i play with paint and the outcome as below........quite a ugly work....haha